However, after I tackled a research project for one of my undergrad classes and was forced to look at both arguments for and against designer dogs with an objective and neutral view, I realized that almost all of today’s purebreds started off just like these new designer dogs.

I am not fond of the wanton breeding that has come about with the arrival of recent designer dogs. Aimless and unethical breeding leads to puppy mill, unwanted dogs, and an increase in the euthanasia rate, as well as many debilitating mental and physical problems. But we find these problems in any cases of sudden increased popularity and breeding. When the movie “Underdog” came out, there was a jump in the breeding and sales of beagles, and then there was a jump in the number of beagles being surrendered to shelters and euthanized or simply abandoned. Same with Dalmatians when “101 Dalmatians” was released.

“Designer dogs” are not so bad on their own. It is the unscrupulous breeding that comes from the sudden popularity of such a “fad.” Breeds being crosses for a purpose other than appearance or “cuteness” are in no way different than the creation of the Doberman or the German shepherd so many years ago. As long as there are rules and standards that are enforced among a circle of dedicated, ethical, and scrupulous breeders who truly want to create a useful and better dog, then there is no problem.

But when you have a breeder that argues that labradoodles are superior dogs because they are hypoallergenic and better in every way than the parent breeds, you know you are dealing with someone who is contributing nothing to the development of the labradoodle as a “breed” but rather perpetuating the blatant disregard for lives they hold in their control. It is not true that cross-breeds are better than their parent breeds in health or anything else. True, the first generation is often a healthier individual, though not always. The second generation, though, is almost always a complete combination of both parent breeds’ flaws.

Also, “hybrid” is an incorrect term for such “designer dogs.” Hybrids are a cross of species, such a wolves and dogs or lions and tigers, not beagles and Dobermans which are within the same species.

And don’t believe anyone when they say that any dog is hypoallergenic. Some dogs have less aggravating dander – such as poodles, shih tzus, etc – but all dogs do have dander, even those hairless Chinese Cresteds.

So when considering a “designer dog,” always look at adoption first. But if you really must go to a breeder, take your time choosing the perfect breeder before you ever look at the parents or puppies. Do plenty of research on the truth about what you are getting, not the propaganda that says “Oh, they’re cute! And so much healthier than the parents!” Then, once you are sure you have found a responsible and appropriate breeder, take a look at both parents. The finally, look at the puppies. But don’t be taken in by the first cute little bundle you find. Take your time. A lifetime of happiness and memories is worth waiting months or even years to find your perfect companion.

The Dobermann IS a mix of dogs but created with a working PURPOSE.
I shun these recent “designer dogs” as they seem to have no purpose other than the novelty or for looks. There are plenty of wonderful animals, “pure breeds” or mixes available and in need of home, I hope all choose to ADOPT rather than support this nonsense!

I found my wonderful rescued friend at http://dobierescue.org/

Heads up. Before you go out and say something about mixed humans, watch who you say it to since I am also a beautifully mixed person. I am talking about the mixing of Dobermans, not humans. I agree with your assessment about mixing breeds to make a better gene pool, but mixing a Doberman and a poodle is just odd! That is my thoughts and you did not have to try and get personal with me.